Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AH3880 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 600.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 8,700 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 60 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 29,684 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Auradine Teraflux AH3880
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 4186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 600.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Auradine Teraflux AH3880 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 4186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 600.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 84% better power draw (1,350 vs 8,700 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 85% better efficacité (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 8% better noise (55.0 vs 60.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 544% more heat output (4,606 vs 29,684 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Auradine Teraflux AH3880 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.83 | Daily net profit | -$3.42 |
| -$1,383 | Net after 1 year | -$1,247 |
| -$2,417 | Net after 2 years | -$2,493 |
| -$3,451 | Net after 3 years | -$3,740 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AH388014.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.83/day compared to $-3.42/day for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 81.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH).