Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer S17

Antminer S17

Taux de hachage 56.0 TH/s Puissance 2,520 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Taux de hachage 600.0 TH/s Puissance 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S17 Specification Auradine Teraflux AH3880
56.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 600.0 TH/s
2,520 W Consommation électrique 8,700 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 60 dB
9.5 kg Weight
8,598 BTU/hr BTU Output 29,684 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S17

Daily Revenue 0.00002533 BTC $1.63
Daily Electricity -$6.05
Daily Profit -$4.42
Monthly -$132.54
Yearly -$1,612.56

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027144 BTC $17.46
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit -$3.42
Monthly -$102.46
Yearly -$1,246.59

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 971% more hashrate (56.0 vs 600.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer S17 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17 and Auradine Teraflux AH3880 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 971% more hashrate (56.0 vs 600.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S17 71% better power draw (2,520 vs 8,700 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 20% better noise (75.0 vs 60.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 245% more heat output (8,598 vs 29,684 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S17 or the Auradine Teraflux AH3880?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $-3.42/day compared to $-4.42/day for the Antminer S17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S17 or the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Antminer S17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S17 or the Auradine Teraflux AH3880?

The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S17 and Auradine Teraflux AH3880?

The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 30.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).