Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Bitaxe GT
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Consommation électrique | 75 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 42 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 256 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Bitaxe GT
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe GT l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 98% better power draw (3,344.0 vs 75.0 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and Bitaxe GT diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 1660% more hashrate (88.0 vs 5.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 98% better power draw (3,344.0 vs 75.0 W)
- Bitaxe GT 61% better efficacité (38.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 0.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 4359% more heat output (11,410 vs 256 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 191% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | Bitaxe GT |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$4.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$2,370 | Net after 1 year | -$499 |
| -$4,143 | Net after 2 years | -$499 |
| -$5,917 | Net after 3 years | -$499 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe GT15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Bitaxe GT: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe GT is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-4.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or the Bitaxe GT better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Bitaxe GT: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and Bitaxe GT on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 23.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (38.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).