Avalon A1566 vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1566 | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 185.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 74.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,330 W |
| 18.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1566
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Avalon A1566, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 150% more hashrate (185.0 vs 74.0 TH/s) in the Avalon A1566's favour. The StrongU Hornbill H8 claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Avalon A1566 and StrongU Hornbill H8 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Avalon A1566 150% more hashrate (185.0 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 3% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,330 W)
- Avalon A1566 59% better efficacité (18.5 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Avalon A1566 100% better weight (14.9 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Avalon A1566 3% more heat output (11,669 vs 11,362 BTU/hr)
- Avalon A1566 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1566 | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$1.55 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$6,066 | Net after 1 year | -$3,145 |
| -$6,632 | Net after 2 years | -$5,090 |
| -$7,198 | Net after 3 years | -$7,035 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Avalon A1566Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Avalon A156618.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Avalon A1566 or StrongU Hornbill H8 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Avalon A1566 is more profitable at $-1.55/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Avalon A1566 vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Avalon A1566 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the StrongU Hornbill H8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1566 vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which fits a residential setup better?
The Avalon A1566 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1566 and StrongU Hornbill H8 on J/TH?
The Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 26.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (18.5 vs 45.0 J/TH).