Canaan Avalon A1566I vs iPollo B1L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Specification | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| 249.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 58.0 TH/s |
| 4,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,000 W |
| 18.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 51.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 11.3 kg | Weight | 12,700.0 kg |
| 15,354 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,236 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A1566I
iPollo B1L
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon A1566I edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 329% more hashrate (249.0 vs 58.0 TH/s). The iPollo B1L holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A1566I and iPollo B1L sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 329% more hashrate (249.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
- iPollo B1L 33% better power draw (4,500 vs 3,000 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 65% better efficacité (18.1 vs 51.7 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 100% better weight (11.3 vs 12,700.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 50% more heat output (15,354 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 100% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon A1566I | Metric | iPollo B1L |
|---|---|---|
| $2,710 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$1.85 | Daily net profit | -$5.11 |
| -$3,384 | Net after 1 year | -$2,297 |
| -$4,058 | Net after 2 years | -$4,163 |
| -$4,731 | Net after 3 years | -$6,030 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566IScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A1566I or the iPollo B1L?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-1.85/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon A1566I or the iPollo B1L better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A1566I or iPollo B1L?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A1566I and iPollo B1L on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 33.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (18.1 vs 51.7 J/TH).