Avalon A1366 vs Canaan Avalon A1566I
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Canaan Avalon A1566I is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1366 runs 130.0 TH/s at 25 J/TH; the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs 249.0 TH/s at 18.1 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1366 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 249.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 4,500 W |
| 25.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.6 kg | Weight | 11.3 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,354 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 32/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1366
Canaan Avalon A1566I
Based on BTC price of $64,959 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566I comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 92% more hashrate (130 vs 249 TH/s). That said, the Avalon A1366 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A1566I actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 92% more hashrate (130 vs 249 TH/s)
- Avalon A1366 28% better power draw (3,250 vs 4,500 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 28% better efficacité (25.0 vs 18.1 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 10% better weight (12.6 vs 11.3 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 38% more heat output (11,089 vs 15,354 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 300% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 32.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Avalon A1366 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,710 |
| -$3.55 | Daily net profit | -$2.66 |
| -$4,796 | Net after 1 year | -$3,681 |
| -$6,092 | Net after 2 years | -$4,653 |
| -$7,388 | Net after 3 years | -$5,624 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566IScore: 32/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Avalon A1366 or Canaan Avalon A1566I more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-3.55/day for the Avalon A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1366 or the Canaan Avalon A1566I better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1366 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Avalon A1366 or Canaan Avalon A1566I?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I scores 32/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Avalon A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Avalon A1366 and Canaan Avalon A1566I on J/TH?
The Avalon A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH — a difference of 6.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 28% better efficacité (25.0 vs 18.1 J/TH).