Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A1566I
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Canaan Avalon A1566I is the stronger pick — it leads on 5 of 6 head-to-head factors. The Avalon A1346 runs 110.0 TH/s at 30 J/TH; the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs 249.0 TH/s at 18.1 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Avalon A1346 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 249.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 4,500 W |
| 30.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.3 kg | Weight | 11.3 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,354 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 32/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Avalon A1346
Canaan Avalon A1566I
Based on BTC price of $64,959 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A1566I l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 126% more hashrate (110 vs 249 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A1566I's favour. The Avalon A1346 claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A1566I actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 126% more hashrate (110 vs 249 TH/s)
- Avalon A1346 27% better power draw (3,300 vs 4,500 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 40% better efficacité (30.0 vs 18.1 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 8% better weight (12.3 vs 11.3 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 36% more heat output (11,260 vs 15,354 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566I 300% more score de minage domestique (8.0 vs 32.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Avalon A1346 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566I |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,710 |
| -$4.32 | Daily net profit | -$2.66 |
| -$4,378 | Net after 1 year | -$3,681 |
| -$5,957 | Net after 2 years | -$4,653 |
| -$7,535 | Net after 3 years | -$5,624 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566IScore: 32/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566I18.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Avalon A1346 or Canaan Avalon A1566I more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566I is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-4.32/day for the Avalon A1346. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Avalon A1346 or the Canaan Avalon A1566I better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Avalon A1346 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Avalon A1346 vs Canaan Avalon A1566I: which fits a residential setup better?
The Canaan Avalon A1566I scores 32/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Avalon A1346). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Avalon A1346 and Canaan Avalon A1566I?
The Avalon A1346 runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566I runs at 18.1 J/TH — a difference of 11.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (30.0 vs 18.1 J/TH).