Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs Whatsminer M63
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T | Specification | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| 215.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 TH/s |
| 3,612 W | Consommation électrique | 7,200 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 20.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 27.5 kg |
| 12,324 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,566 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
Whatsminer M63
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T et le Whatsminer M63 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and Whatsminer M63 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M63 67% more hashrate (215 vs 360 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 50% better power draw (3,612 vs 7,200 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 16% better efficacité (16.8 vs 20.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 46% better weight (14.9 vs 27.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M63 99% more heat output (12,324 vs 24,566 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T | Metric | Whatsminer M63 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $11,000 |
| -$0.93 | Daily net profit | -$4.33 |
| -$340 | Net after 1 year | -$12,579 |
| -$681 | Net after 2 years | -$14,158 |
| -$1,021 | Net after 3 years | -$15,738 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or Whatsminer M63 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.93/day compared to $-4.33/day for the Whatsminer M63. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs Whatsminer M63: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs Whatsminer M63: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M63 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs Whatsminer M63: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63 runs at 20.0 J/TH — a difference of 3.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (16.8 vs 20.0 J/TH).
