Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Specification | Bitfily Snow Panther B1 |
|---|---|---|
| 218.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 3,662 W | Consommation électrique | 1,380 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 86.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 4,500.0 kg |
| 12,495 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,709 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | Bitfily |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T
Bitfily Snow Panther B1
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 1263% more hashrate (218.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Bitfily Snow Panther B1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 1263% more hashrate (218.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 62% better power draw (3,662 vs 1,380 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 81% better efficacité (16.8 vs 86.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 100% better weight (14.9 vs 4,500.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T 165% more heat output (12,495 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
- Bitfily Snow Panther B1 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T | Metric | Bitfily Snow Panther B1 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,525 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.95 | Daily net profit | -$2.74 |
| -$2,870 | Net after 1 year | -$999 |
| -$3,215 | Net after 2 years | -$1,998 |
| -$3,561 | Net after 3 years | -$2,996 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitfily Snow Panther B1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T is more profitable at $-0.95/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Bitfily Snow Panther B1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T vs Bitfily Snow Panther B1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T or the Bitfily Snow Panther B1?
The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T and Bitfily Snow Panther B1?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-218T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 runs at 86.3 J/TH — a difference of 69.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (16.8 vs 86.3 J/TH).