Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 vs Whatsminer M30S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 TH/s |
| 2,380 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 64.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 7,600.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 8,121 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Whatsminer M30S+
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M30S+ l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 170% more hashrate (37.0 vs 100.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M30S+'s favour. That said, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 and Whatsminer M30S+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M30S+ 170% more hashrate (37.0 vs 100.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 30% better power draw (2,380 vs 3,400 W)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 47% better efficacité (64.3 vs 34.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 100% better weight (7,600.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 43% more heat output (8,121 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M30S+ 38% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S+ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,800 |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$1,599 | Net after 1 year | -$3,465 |
| -$3,198 | Net after 2 years | -$5,131 |
| -$4,797 | Net after 3 years | -$6,796 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M30S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S+34.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or Whatsminer M30S+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 is more profitable at $-4.38/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Whatsminer M30S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the Whatsminer M30S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M30S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the Whatsminer M30S+?
The Whatsminer M30S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 and Whatsminer M30S+ on J/TH?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 30.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (64.3 vs 34.0 J/TH).