iPollo B1L vs StealthMiner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 18 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 28 dB |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 61 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
StealthMiner
Based on BTC price of $78,273 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the StealthMiner edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 18.0 W) in the StealthMiner's favour. The iPollo B1L holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo B1L and StealthMiner diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo B1L 7150% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.8 TH/s)
- StealthMiner 99% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 18.0 W)
- StealthMiner 56% better efficacité (51.7 vs 22.5 J/TH)
- StealthMiner 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 1.5 kg)
- iPollo B1L 16571% more heat output (10,236.0 vs 61.4 BTU/hr)
- StealthMiner 218% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$2,295 | Net after 1 year | -$204 |
| -$4,161 | Net after 2 years | -$210 |
| -$6,026 | Net after 3 years | -$215 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
StealthMinerScore: 70/100. 28 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StealthMiner22.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo B1L or the StealthMiner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StealthMiner is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo B1L or the StealthMiner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The StealthMiner is quieter at 28 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the StealthMiner?
The StealthMiner scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and StealthMiner?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the StealthMiner runs at 22.5 J/TH — a difference of 29.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (51.7 vs 22.5 J/TH).