Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Taux de hachage 1,200.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
StealthMiner

StealthMiner

Taux de hachage 800.0 GH/s Puissance 18 W Efficiency 22.5 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs StealthMiner

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification StealthMiner
1,200.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 800.0 GH/s
15 W Consommation électrique 18 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 22.5 J/TH
38 dB Niveau de bruit 28 dB
0.3 kg Weight 1.5 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 61 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 70/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000055 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit $0.01
Monthly $0.20
Yearly $2.38

StealthMiner

Daily Revenue 0.00000037 BTC $0.03
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.01
Monthly -$0.45
Yearly -$5.42

Based on BTC price of $76,996 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe Gamma l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 44% better efficacité (12.5 vs 22.5 J/TH) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. The StealthMiner holds the edge in niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitaxe Gamma and StealthMiner actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitaxe Gamma 50% more hashrate (1.2 vs 0.8 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 17% better power draw (15.0 vs 18.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 44% better efficacité (12.5 vs 22.5 J/TH)
  • StealthMiner 26% better noise (38.0 vs 28.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 80% better weight (0.3 vs 1.5 kg)
  • StealthMiner 20% more heat output (51.2 vs 61.4 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric StealthMiner
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $199
$0.01 Daily net profit -$0.01
-$97 Net after 1 year -$204
-$94 Net after 2 years -$210
-$92 Net after 3 years -$215
Takes ~41.6 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitaxe Gamma

$0.02/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe Gamma or StealthMiner more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.01/day compared to $-0.01/day for the StealthMiner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitaxe Gamma vs StealthMiner: which runs at a lower noise level?

The StealthMiner is quieter at 28 dB compared to the Bitaxe Gamma at 38 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitaxe Gamma vs StealthMiner: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Bitaxe Gamma vs StealthMiner: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the StealthMiner runs at 22.5 J/TH — a difference of 10.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (12.5 vs 22.5 J/TH).