GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M56S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| GMO miner B2 | Specification | Whatsminer M56S |
|---|---|---|
| 24.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 212.0 TH/s |
| 1,950 W | Consommation électrique | 5,550 W |
| 81.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 6,653 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,937 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| GMO miner | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
GMO miner B2
Whatsminer M56S
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M56S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 783% more hashrate (24.0 vs 212.0 TH/s). That said, the GMO miner B2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The GMO miner B2 and Whatsminer M56S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M56S 783% more hashrate (24.0 vs 212.0 TH/s)
- GMO miner B2 65% better power draw (1,950 vs 5,550 W)
- Whatsminer M56S 68% better efficacité (81.3 vs 26.2 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M56S 185% more heat output (6,653 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M56S 57% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| GMO miner B2 | Metric | Whatsminer M56S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$3.82 | Daily net profit | -$5.70 |
| -$1,393 | Net after 1 year | -$7,579 |
| -$2,786 | Net after 2 years | -$9,658 |
| -$4,180 | Net after 3 years | -$11,738 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M56SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M56S26.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the GMO miner B2 or Whatsminer M56S more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the GMO miner B2 is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-5.70/day for the Whatsminer M56S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M56S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M56S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the GMO miner B2 or the Whatsminer M56S?
The Whatsminer M56S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M56S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56S runs at 26.2 J/TH — a difference of 55.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (81.3 vs 26.2 J/TH).