Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

GMO miner B3

GMO miner B3

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 3,417 W Efficiency 103.6 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s Puissance 1,980 W Efficiency 82.5 J/TH

GMO miner B3 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

GMO miner B3 Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo
33.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s
3,417 W Consommation électrique 1,980 W
103.6 J/TH Efficiency 82.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
5,000.0 kg Weight 7,500.0 kg
11,659 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,756 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
GMO miner Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

GMO miner B3

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$8.20
Daily Profit -$7.01
Monthly -$210.38
Yearly -$2,559.67

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.86
Daily Electricity -$4.75
Daily Profit -$3.89
Monthly -$116.64
Yearly -$1,419.12

Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 42% better power draw (3,417 vs 1,980 W). The GMO miner B3 claws back ground on hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T2 Turbo — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The GMO miner B3 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • GMO miner B3 38% more hashrate (33.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 42% better power draw (3,417 vs 1,980 W)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 20% better efficacité (103.6 vs 82.5 J/TH)
  • GMO miner B3 33% better weight (5,000 vs 7,500 kg)
  • GMO miner B3 73% more heat output (11,659 vs 6,756 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T2 Turbo

82.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the GMO miner B3 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo is more profitable at $-3.89/day compared to $-7.01/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the GMO miner B3 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the GMO miner B3 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the GMO miner B3 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo on J/TH?

The GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo runs at 82.5 J/TH — a difference of 21.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (103.6 vs 82.5 J/TH).