GMO miner B3 vs Whatsminer M56S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| GMO miner B3 | Specification | Whatsminer M56S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 212.0 TH/s |
| 3,417 W | Consommation électrique | 5,550 W |
| 103.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 26.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 5,000.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,659 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,937 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| GMO miner | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
GMO miner B3
Whatsminer M56S
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M56S l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 542% more hashrate (33.0 vs 212.0 TH/s). That said, the GMO miner B3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the GMO miner B3 and Whatsminer M56S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M56S 542% more hashrate (33.0 vs 212.0 TH/s)
- GMO miner B3 38% better power draw (3,417 vs 5,550 W)
- Whatsminer M56S 75% better efficacité (103.6 vs 26.2 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M56S 100% better weight (5,000.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M56S 62% more heat output (11,659 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M56S 100% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| GMO miner B3 | Metric | Whatsminer M56S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$7.01 | Daily net profit | -$5.69 |
| -$2,560 | Net after 1 year | -$7,577 |
| -$5,120 | Net after 2 years | -$9,654 |
| -$7,679 | Net after 3 years | -$11,731 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M56SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M56S26.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMO miner B3 vs Whatsminer M56S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M56S is more profitable at $-5.69/day compared to $-7.01/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
GMO miner B3 vs Whatsminer M56S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M56S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
GMO miner B3 vs Whatsminer M56S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M56S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
GMO miner B3 vs Whatsminer M56S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56S runs at 26.2 J/TH — a difference of 77.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (103.6 vs 26.2 J/TH).