Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-G28

Baikal BK-G28

Taux de hachage 28.0 GH/s Puissance 1,300 W Efficiency 46,428.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM22G

iBeLink DM22G

Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH

Baikal BK-G28 vs iBeLink DM22G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-G28 Specification iBeLink DM22G
28.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s
1,300 W Consommation électrique 810 W
46,428.6 J/TH Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
6,550.0 kg Weight 19,000.0 kg
4,436 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,764 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-G28

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.12
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.57
Yearly -$1,138.43

iBeLink DM22G

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.30
Yearly -$709.27

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink DM22G, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 38% better power draw (1,300 vs 810 W). The Baikal BK-G28 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iBeLink DM22G — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-G28 and iBeLink DM22G actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal BK-G28 27% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink DM22G 38% better power draw (1,300 vs 810 W)
  • iBeLink DM22G 21% better efficacité (46,429 vs 36,818 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-G28 66% better weight (6,550 vs 19,000 kg)
  • Baikal BK-G28 60% more heat output (4,436 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-G28 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-G28

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DM22G

36,818.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Baikal BK-G28 vs iBeLink DM22G: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM22G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Baikal BK-G28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal BK-G28 or the iBeLink DM22G better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-G28 or the iBeLink DM22G?

The Baikal BK-G28 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM22G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Baikal BK-G28 and iBeLink DM22G on J/TH?

The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the iBeLink DM22G runs at 36,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 9,610.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficacité (46,429 vs 36,818 J/TH).