Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-X

Baikal BK-X

Taux de hachage 10.0 GH/s Puissance 630 W Efficiency 63,000.0 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM22G

iBeLink DM22G

Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM22G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-X Specification iBeLink DM22G
10.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s
630 W Consommation électrique 810 W
63,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,700.0 kg Weight 19,000.0 kg
2,150 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,764 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.51
Daily Profit -$1.51
Monthly -$45.35
Yearly -$551.75

iBeLink DM22G

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.30
Yearly -$709.27

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink DM22G edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 120% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal BK-X claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iBeLink DM22G — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-X and iBeLink DM22G actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iBeLink DM22G 120% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-X 22% better power draw (630 vs 810 W)
  • iBeLink DM22G 42% better efficacité (63,000 vs 36,818 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-X 81% better weight (3,700 vs 19,000 kg)
  • iBeLink DM22G 29% more heat output (2,150 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-X 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-X

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DM22G

36,818.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM22G: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM22G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM22G: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-X or the iBeLink DM22G?

The Baikal BK-X scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM22G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM22G: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM22G runs at 36,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 26,181.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (63,000 vs 36,818 J/TH).