iBeLink BM-K1 vs Goldshell KD Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.2 TH/s |
| 835 W | Consommation électrique | 3,350 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 83.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
Goldshell KD Max
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD Max, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 658% more hashrate (5.3 vs 40.2 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-K1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K1 and Goldshell KD Max sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD Max 658% more hashrate (5.3 vs 40.2 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-K1 75% better power draw (835 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell KD Max 47% better efficacité (157.6 vs 83.3 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K1 22% better weight (6,600 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell KD Max 301% more heat output (2,849 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-K1 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,320 |
| -$1.81 | Daily net profit | -$6.59 |
| -$10,517 | Net after 1 year | -$3,727 |
| -$11,179 | Net after 2 years | -$6,134 |
| -$11,841 | Net after 3 years | -$8,541 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-K1Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Max83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K1 or Goldshell KD Max more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K1 is more profitable at $-1.81/day compared to $-6.59/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs Goldshell KD Max: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K1 or Goldshell KD Max?
The iBeLink BM-K1 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 and Goldshell KD Max?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH — a difference of 74.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (157.6 vs 83.3 J/TH).