Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.2 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,350 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 83.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD Max
Based on BTC price of $77,004 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 11166567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.2 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD Max's favour. The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD Max sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD Max 11166567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max 1% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell KD Max 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 83.3 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD Max 2% more heat output (11,260 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 127% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD Max |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,320 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$6.62 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,735 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$6,149 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$8,564 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD Max83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD Max?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD Max is more profitable at $-6.62/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KD Max better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD Max at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD Max: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell KD Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD Max?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,583.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,666.7 vs 83.3 J/TH).