iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-KS Max edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 5400% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.2 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-KS Max's favour. That said, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 5400% more hashrate (11.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,400 vs 100 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 38% better efficacité (309 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 80% better weight (12.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 3300% more heat output (11,601 vs 341 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 190.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (309 vs 500 J/TH).