iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-KS Max l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1000% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-KS Max and Iceriver KS1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1000% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 82% better power draw (3,400 vs 600 W)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 48% better efficacité (309 vs 600 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 18% better weight (12.2 vs 14.9 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 467% more heat output (11,601 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-KS Max309.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the Iceriver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-KS Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 290.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (309 vs 600 J/TH).