Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Taux de hachage 6.6 TH/s Puissance 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
Bitmain CK6-SE

Bitmain CK6-SE

Taux de hachage 17.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 194.1 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Bitmain CK6-SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification Bitmain CK6-SE
6.6 TH/s Taux de hachage 17.0 TH/s
2,400 W Consommation électrique 3,300 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 194.1 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 80 dB
9,900.0 kg Weight 11.5 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 29/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.67
Yearly -$2,015.71

Bitmain CK6-SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000782 BTC $0.61
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.31
Monthly -$219.25
Yearly -$2,667.50

Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain CK6-SE, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 158% more hashrate (6.6 vs 17.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain CK6-SE's favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain CK6-SE — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N1 and Bitmain CK6-SE sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain CK6-SE 158% more hashrate (6.6 vs 17.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 27% better power draw (2,400 vs 3,300 W)
  • Bitmain CK6-SE 47% better efficacité (364 vs 194 J/TH)
  • Bitmain CK6-SE 100% better weight (9,900.0 vs 11.5 kg)
  • Bitmain CK6-SE 38% more heat output (8,189 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain CK6-SE 12% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 29.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain CK6-SE

Score: 29/100. 80 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain CK6-SE

194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iBeLink BM-N1 vs Bitmain CK6-SE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N1 is more profitable at $-5.52/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink BM-N1 or the Bitmain CK6-SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N1 or Bitmain CK6-SE?

The Bitmain CK6-SE scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N1 and Bitmain CK6-SE?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 169.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (364 vs 194 J/TH).