Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain CK6-SE

Bitmain CK6-SE

Taux de hachage 17.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 194.1 J/TH
VS
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Taux de hachage 1.3 TH/s Puissance 185 W Efficiency 142.3 J/TH

Bitmain CK6-SE vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain CK6-SE Specification iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
17.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 1.3 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 185 W
194.1 J/TH Efficiency 142.3 J/TH
80 dB Niveau de bruit
11.5 kg Weight 2.2 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 631 BTU/hr
29/100 Home Mining Score 33/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme Eaglesong
Bitmain Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain CK6-SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000782 BTC $0.61
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.31
Monthly -$219.25
Yearly -$2,667.55

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000060 BTC $0.05
Daily Electricity -$0.44
Daily Profit -$0.40
Monthly -$11.92
Yearly -$144.99

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W). That said, the Bitmain CK6-SE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain CK6-SE and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitmain CK6-SE 1208% more hashrate (17.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 27% better efficacité (194 vs 142 J/TH)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 81% better weight (11.5 vs 2.2 kg)
  • Bitmain CK6-SE 1684% more heat output (11,260 vs 631 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 14% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 33.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)

142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain CK6-SE or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain CK6-SE or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?

The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain CK6-SE or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?

The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain CK6-SE and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) on J/TH?

The Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 51.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (194 vs 142 J/TH).