iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.3 TH/s |
| 835 W | Consommation électrique | 185 W |
| 157.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 2,849 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K1
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,078 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 78% better power draw (835 vs 185 W). The iBeLink BM-K1 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-K1 308% more hashrate (5.3 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 78% better power draw (835 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 10% better efficacité (158 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 100% better weight (6,600.0 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-K1 351% more heat output (2,849 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K1 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $9,855 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.81 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$10,517 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$11,179 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$11,841 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-1.81/day for the iBeLink BM-K1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K1 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink BM-K1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K1 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink BM-K1 runs at 157.6 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 15.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (158 vs 142 J/TH).