iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 185 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,078 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 746% more hashrate (11.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 95% better power draw (3,400 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 54% better efficacité (309 vs 142 J/TH)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 82% better weight (12.2 vs 2.2 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 1738% more heat output (11,601 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 9% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.76 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$4,633 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$7,467 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$10,301 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-KS MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)142.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-7.76/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 166.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (309 vs 142 J/TH).
