iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Specification | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 185 W |
| 47.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 142.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 631 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K3
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,078 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-K3 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 5285% more hashrate (70.0 vs 1.3 TH/s). The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-K3 5285% more hashrate (70.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 94% better power draw (3,300 vs 185 W)
- iBeLink BM-K3 67% better efficacité (47.1 vs 142.3 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K3 1684% more heat output (11,260 vs 631 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) 50% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Metric | iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $820 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$0.40 |
| -$2,793 | Net after 1 year | -$145 |
| -$4,766 | Net after 2 years | -$290 |
| -$6,738 | Net after 3 years | -$435 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) is more profitable at $-0.40/day compared to $-5.40/day for the iBeLink BM-K3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th)?
The iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the iBeLink N3 mini (1.3Th) runs at 142.3 J/TH — a difference of 95.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (47.1 vs 142.3 J/TH).