Elphapex DG1S vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG1S | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 310,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 25.0 kg | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG1S
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Elphapex DG1S et le Goldshell E-DG1M sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Elphapex DG1S and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG1S 194% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 42% better power draw (3,100 vs 1,800 W)
- Elphapex DG1S 41% better efficacité (310,000 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 10% better noise (50.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 36% better weight (25.0 vs 16.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG1S 72% more heat output (10,577 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 12% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Elphapex DG1S | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $2,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.44 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$5,515 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$8,231 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$10,946 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG1S310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Elphapex DG1S or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-7.44/day for the Elphapex DG1S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Elphapex DG1S or the Goldshell E-DG1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Elphapex DG1S at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Elphapex DG1S vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Elphapex DG1S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG1S and Goldshell E-DG1M?
The Elphapex DG1S runs at 310,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 219,411.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (310,000 vs 529,412 J/TH).