Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink DM11G

iBeLink DM11G

Taux de hachage 10.8 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s Puissance 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH

iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Giant+ A2000

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink DM11G Specification Baikal Giant+ A2000
10.8 GH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s
810 W Consommation électrique 450 W
75,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
19,000.0 kg Weight 2,980.0 kg
2,764 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,535 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
iBeLink Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink DM11G

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.31
Yearly -$709.42

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink DM11G edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 440% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Giant+ A2000 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink DM11G — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink DM11G and Baikal Giant+ A2000 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink DM11G 440% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 44% better power draw (810 vs 450 W)
  • iBeLink DM11G 67% better efficacité (75,000 vs 225,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 84% better weight (19,000 vs 2,980 kg)
  • iBeLink DM11G 80% more heat output (2,764 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 21% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 34.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink DM11G

75,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink DM11G or Baikal Giant+ A2000 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM11G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iBeLink DM11G or the Baikal Giant+ A2000 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink DM11G or the Baikal Giant+ A2000?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM11G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 150,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (75,000 vs 225,000 J/TH).