iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink DM11G | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 810 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 75,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 19,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,764 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink DM11G
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink DM11G l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 3500% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink DM11G's favour. That said, the Baikal Miner Cube isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink DM11G and Baikal Miner Cube diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink DM11G 3500% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 89% better power draw (810.0 vs 90.0 W)
- iBeLink DM11G 75% better efficacité (75,000 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- iBeLink DM11G 800% more heat output (2,764 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink DM11G | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$1.94 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$709 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$1,419 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$2,128 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink DM11G75,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink DM11G or the Baikal Miner Cube?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM11G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Miner Cube: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink DM11G or Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM11G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink DM11G vs Baikal Miner Cube: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 225,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 75% better efficacité (75,000 vs 300,000 J/TH).