Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

PinIdea DR-3

PinIdea DR-3

Taux de hachage 600.0 MH/s Puissance 345 W Efficiency 575,000.0 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s Puissance 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH

PinIdea DR-3 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

PinIdea DR-3 Specification Baikal Giant+ A2000
600.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s
345 W Consommation électrique 450 W
575,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 2,980.0 kg
1,177 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,535 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
PinIdea Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

PinIdea DR-3

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.83
Daily Profit -$0.83
Monthly -$24.84
Yearly -$302.21

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the PinIdea DR-3 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Baikal Giant+ A2000 — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the PinIdea DR-3 and Baikal Giant+ A2000 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • PinIdea DR-3 23% better power draw (345 vs 450 W)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 61% better efficacité (575,000 vs 225,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 30% more heat output (1,177 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal Giant+ A2000

225,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

PinIdea DR-3 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PinIdea DR-3 is more profitable at $-0.83/day compared to $-1.08/day for the Baikal Giant+ A2000. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

PinIdea DR-3 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the PinIdea DR-3 or the Baikal Giant+ A2000?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

PinIdea DR-3 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The PinIdea DR-3 runs at 575,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 350,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (575,000 vs 225,000 J/TH).