Goldshell E-AL1M vs IceRiver AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Specification | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 MH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 409.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 10 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-AL1M
IceRiver AL0
Based on BTC price of $74,845 and current network difficulty as of Mar 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Le IceRiver AL0 a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-AL1M or IceRiver AL0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-4.18/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell E-AL1M or IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell E-AL1M or IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-AL1M and IceRiver AL0?
The Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH while the IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,590.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.