Goldshell E-AL1M vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.3 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 1,600 W |
| 409.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell E-AL1M
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,251 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-AL1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 33% more hashrate (4.4 vs 3.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell E-AL1M's favour. That said, the Dragonball Miner A40 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell E-AL1M and Dragonball Miner A40 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-AL1M 33% more hashrate (4.4 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- Dragonball Miner A40 11% better power draw (1,800 vs 1,600 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 16% better efficacité (409 vs 485 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 13% more heat output (6,142 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball Miner A40 50% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell E-AL1M | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$4.16 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$2,318 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$3,837 | Net after 2 years | -$6,116 |
| -$5,356 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball Miner A40Score: 42/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell E-AL1M or Dragonball Miner A40 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Dragonball Miner A40 is more profitable at $-3.72/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell E-AL1M or Dragonball Miner A40?
The Dragonball Miner A40 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell E-AL1M or the Dragonball Miner A40?
The Dragonball Miner A40 scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell E-AL1M and Dragonball Miner A40?
The Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 75.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (409 vs 485 J/TH).