Elphapex DG Home 1 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG Home 1 | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 2,100.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 MH/s |
| 630 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 300,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 10.3 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 2,150 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 58/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG Home 1
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Elphapex DG Home 1, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 163% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Elphapex DG Home 1 and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG Home 1 163% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 21% better power draw (630 vs 500 W)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 52% better efficacité (300,000 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 18% better noise (45.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 69% better weight (10.3 vs 3.2 kg)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 26% more heat output (2,150 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 7% more score de minage domestique (58.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Elphapex DG Home 1 | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$1.51 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$3,052 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$3,604 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$4,156 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Home 1300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Elphapex DG Home 1 or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-1.51/day for the Elphapex DG Home 1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Elphapex DG Home 1 or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG Home 1 or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 58/100 for the Elphapex DG Home 1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Elphapex DG Home 1 vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 325,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (300,000 vs 625,000 J/TH).