Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo G1 Mini

iPollo G1 Mini

Taux de hachage 1.2 GH/s Puissance 120 W Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini Classic

iPollo V1 Mini Classic

Taux de hachage 130.0 MH/s Puissance 104 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Mini Specification iPollo V1 Mini Classic
1.2 GH/s Taux de hachage 130.0 MH/s
120 W Consommation électrique 104 W
100,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
2.9 kg Weight 1,000.0 kg
409 BTU/hr BTU Output 355 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithme Etchash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.29
Monthly -$8.64
Yearly -$105.10

iPollo V1 Mini Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.25
Daily Profit -$0.25
Monthly -$7.49
Yearly -$91.10

Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo G1 Mini, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 823% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo G1 Mini's favour. The iPollo V1 Mini Classic holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 Mini — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V1 Mini Classic actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo G1 Mini 823% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini Classic 13% better power draw (120 vs 104 W)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 88% better efficacité (100,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 100% better weight (2.9 vs 1,000.0 kg)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 15% more heat output (409 vs 355 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Mini Metric iPollo V1 Mini Classic
$277 Upfront cost (MSRP) $285
-$0.29 Daily net profit -$0.25
-$382 Net after 1 year -$376
-$487 Net after 2 years -$467
-$592 Net after 3 years -$558
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1 Mini

100,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo G1 Mini or the iPollo V1 Mini Classic?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-0.29/day for the iPollo G1 Mini. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo G1 Mini runs at 100,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 700,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficacité (100,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).