iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Classic |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 130.0 MH/s |
| 3,100 W | Consommation électrique | 104 W |
| 861,111.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 1,000.0 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 355 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (3,100 vs 104 W). That said, the iPollo V1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Mini Classic diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 2669% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 97% better power draw (3,100 vs 104 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 92% better weight (13,000 vs 1,000 kg)
- iPollo V1 2881% more heat output (10,577 vs 355 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Classic |
|---|---|---|
| $1,699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $285 |
| -$7.44 | Daily net profit | -$0.25 |
| -$4,415 | Net after 1 year | -$376 |
| -$7,130 | Net after 2 years | -$467 |
| -$9,846 | Net after 3 years | -$558 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini ClassicScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Classic800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 or the iPollo V1 Mini Classic better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Mini Classic on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 61,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH).