Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo G1 Mini

iPollo G1 Mini

Taux de hachage 1.2 GH/s Puissance 120 W Efficiency 100,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini SE

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Taux de hachage 220.0 MH/s Puissance 116 W Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Mini Specification iPollo V1 Mini SE
1.2 GH/s Taux de hachage 220.0 MH/s
120 W Consommation électrique 116 W
100,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
2.9 kg Weight 2.1 kg
409 BTU/hr BTU Output 396 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithme EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.29
Daily Profit -$0.29
Monthly -$8.64
Yearly -$105.10

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.28
Monthly -$8.35
Yearly -$101.61

Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo G1 Mini comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficacité, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini SE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 Mini — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V1 Mini SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo G1 Mini 445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 3% better power draw (120 vs 116 W)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 81% better efficacité (100,000 vs 527,273 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 26% better weight (2.9 vs 2.1 kg)
  • iPollo G1 Mini 3% more heat output (409 vs 396 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Mini Metric iPollo V1 Mini SE
$277 Upfront cost (MSRP) $279
-$0.29 Daily net profit -$0.28
-$382 Net after 1 year -$381
-$487 Net after 2 years -$482
-$592 Net after 3 years -$584
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1 Mini

100,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo G1 Mini vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-0.29/day for the iPollo G1 Mini. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo G1 Mini or the iPollo V1 Mini SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo G1 Mini or iPollo V1 Mini SE?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the iPollo G1 Mini and iPollo V1 Mini SE on J/TH?

The iPollo G1 Mini runs at 100,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 427,272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (100,000 vs 527,273 J/TH).