Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Taux de hachage 1.6 GH/s Puissance 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini SE

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Taux de hachage 220.0 MH/s Puissance 116 W Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Classic Specification iPollo V1 Mini SE
1.6 GH/s Taux de hachage 220.0 MH/s
1,240 W Consommation électrique 116 W
800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 527,272.7 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
13,000.0 kg Weight 2.1 kg
4,231 BTU/hr BTU Output 396 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithme EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

iPollo V1 Mini SE

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.28
Daily Profit -$0.28
Monthly -$8.35
Yearly -$101.61

Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Mini SE finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

The iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Mini SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 Classic 605% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 91% better power draw (1,240 vs 116 W)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 34% better efficacité (800,000 vs 527,273 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini SE 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 2.1 kg)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 969% more heat output (4,231 vs 396 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo V1 Classic Metric iPollo V1 Mini SE
$369 Upfront cost (MSRP) $279
-$2.98 Daily net profit -$0.28
-$1,455 Net after 1 year -$381
-$2,541 Net after 2 years -$482
-$3,628 Net after 3 years -$584
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Classic

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Mini SE

527,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Mini SE: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE is more profitable at $-0.28/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V1 Mini SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Classic or iPollo V1 Mini SE?

The iPollo V1 Classic scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Mini SE?

The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE runs at 527,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 272,727.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (800,000 vs 527,273 J/TH).