Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Holic H28

Holic H28

Taux de hachage 28.0 TH/s Puissance 2,100 W Efficiency 75.0 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M56

Whatsminer M56

Taux de hachage 194.0 TH/s Puissance 5,550 W Efficiency 28.6 J/TH

Holic H28 vs Whatsminer M56

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Holic H28 Specification Whatsminer M56
28.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 194.0 TH/s
2,100 W Consommation électrique 5,550 W
75.0 J/TH Efficiency 28.6 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 50 dB
Weight 13.0 kg
7,165 BTU/hr BTU Output 18,937 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Holic Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Holic H28

Daily Revenue 0.00001289 BTC $1.01
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$4.03
Monthly -$121.01
Yearly -$1,472.31

Whatsminer M56

Daily Revenue 0.00008928 BTC $6.97
Daily Electricity -$13.32
Daily Profit -$6.35
Monthly -$190.44
Yearly -$2,317.03

Based on BTC price of $78,095 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M56 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 593% more hashrate (28.0 vs 194.0 TH/s). The Holic H28 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Whatsminer M56 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Holic H28 and Whatsminer M56 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M56 593% more hashrate (28.0 vs 194.0 TH/s)
  • Holic H28 62% better power draw (2,100 vs 5,550 W)
  • Whatsminer M56 62% better efficacité (75.0 vs 28.6 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M56 164% more heat output (7,165 vs 18,937 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M56 69% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 44.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Holic H28 Metric Whatsminer M56
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,000
-$4.03 Daily net profit -$6.35
-$1,472 Net after 1 year -$7,317
-$2,945 Net after 2 years -$9,634
-$4,417 Net after 3 years -$11,951
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M56

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M56

28.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Holic H28 or the Whatsminer M56?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Holic H28 is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-6.35/day for the Whatsminer M56. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Holic H28 or Whatsminer M56?

The Whatsminer M56 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Holic H28 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Holic H28 or the Whatsminer M56?

The Whatsminer M56 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Holic H28). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Holic H28 and Whatsminer M56?

The Holic H28 runs at 75.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M56 runs at 28.6 J/TH — a difference of 46.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (75.0 vs 28.6 J/TH).