IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 250 J/TH) in the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra's favour. The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 99900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 250 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 71% better noise (10.0 vs 35.0 dB)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver AL0 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-0.24/day for the IceRiver AL0. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra at 35 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver AL0 or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,750.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 250 J/TH).