Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.4 TH/s). That said, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 3650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 7% better efficacité (233 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $77 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$159 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$242 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$324 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 UltraScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Ultra runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (233 vs 250 J/TH).