Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

IceRiver KS0 Pro

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Taux de hachage 200.0 GH/s Puissance 100 W Efficiency 500.0 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS0

Iceriver KS0

Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s Puissance 65 W Efficiency 650.0 J/TH

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS0

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

IceRiver KS0 Pro Specification Iceriver KS0
200.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 100.0 GH/s
100 W Consommation électrique 65 W
500.0 J/TH Efficiency 650.0 J/TH
35 dB Niveau de bruit
2.5 kg Weight 2.5 kg
341 BTU/hr BTU Output 222 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
IceRiver Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000009 BTC $0.01
Daily Electricity -$0.24
Daily Profit -$0.23
Monthly -$6.98
Yearly -$84.97

Iceriver KS0

Daily Revenue 0.00000005 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.15
Monthly -$4.57
Yearly -$55.63

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS0 Pro, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 100% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS0 Pro's favour. The Iceriver KS0 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: IceRiver KS0 Pro — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS0 Pro and Iceriver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:

  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 100% more hashrate (0.2 vs 0.1 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS0 35% better power draw (100.0 vs 65.0 W)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 23% better efficacité (500 vs 650 J/TH)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 54% more heat output (341 vs 222 BTU/hr)
  • IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

IceRiver KS0 Pro Metric Iceriver KS0
$199 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.23 Daily net profit -$0.15
-$284 Net after 1 year -$56
-$369 Net after 2 years -$111
-$454 Net after 3 years -$167
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

IceRiver KS0 Pro

Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

IceRiver KS0 Pro

500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or the Iceriver KS0?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-0.23/day for the IceRiver KS0 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS0: which runs at a lower noise level?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS0). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KS0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 150.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficacité (500 vs 650 J/TH).