IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS5L
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 | Specification | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 650.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 283.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0
Iceriver KS5L
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS5L edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 11900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 12.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS5L's favour. The IceRiver KS0 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KS5L diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS5L 11900% more hashrate (0.1 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 98% better power draw (65.0 vs 3,400.0 W)
- Iceriver KS5L 56% better efficacité (650 vs 283 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KS5L 5130% more heat output (222 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 | Metric | Iceriver KS5L |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $400 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$7.73 |
| -$155 | Net after 1 year | -$3,221 |
| -$210 | Net after 2 years | -$6,042 |
| -$266 | Net after 3 years | -$8,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS5L: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-7.73/day for the Iceriver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 or Iceriver KS5L?
The IceRiver KS0 is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS5L at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 vs Iceriver KS5L: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS5L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS0 and Iceriver KS5L on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH — a difference of 366.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (650 vs 283 J/TH).