IceRiver KS2 vs IceRiver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS2 | Specification | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS2
IceRiver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 300% more hashrate (2.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). That said, the IceRiver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS2 and IceRiver KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS3 300% more hashrate (2.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 63% better power draw (1,200 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3 33% better efficacité (600 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3 4% better weight (15.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 167% more heat output (4,094 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS2 | Metric | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$6,025 | Net after 1 year | -$12,698 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 2 years | -$15,396 |
| -$8,075 | Net after 3 years | -$18,094 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS2 or the IceRiver KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS2 or IceRiver KS3?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS2 vs IceRiver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS2 vs IceRiver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 200.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (600 vs 400 J/TH).