IceRiver KS2 vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS2 | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 45.0 GH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,845 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS2
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver KS2 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The IceRiver KS2 and SuperScalar K10 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- IceRiver KS2 4344% more hashrate (2.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS2 35% better power draw (1,200 vs 1,845 W)
- IceRiver KS2 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 45% better weight (15.0 vs 8.3 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 54% more heat output (4,094 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 86% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS2 | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$6,025 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 2 years | -$8,431 |
| -$8,075 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS2 vs SuperScalar K10: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS2 or SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the IceRiver KS2 or the SuperScalar K10?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS2 and SuperScalar K10 on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (600 vs 41,000 J/TH).