IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS2 | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 600.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS2
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS2 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% more hashrate (2.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KS1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS2 100% more hashrate (2.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 50% better power draw (1,200 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS2 13% better noise (65.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KS1 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS2 100% more heat output (4,094 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS2 18% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS2 | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$2.81 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$6,025 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$7,050 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$8,075 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS2Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KS1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-2.81/day for the IceRiver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS2 vs Iceriver KS1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS2 is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Iceriver KS1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS2 or Iceriver KS1?
The IceRiver KS2 scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Iceriver KS1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver KS2 and Iceriver KS1 on J/TH?
The IceRiver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.