IceRiver KS3M vs Thewindminer K9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3M | Specification | Thewindminer K9 |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.3 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 566.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 320.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Thewindminer |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3M
Thewindminer K9
Based on BTC price of $77,864 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Thewindminer K9 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 43% better efficacité (567 vs 320 J/TH). The IceRiver KS3M holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3M and Thewindminer K9 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Thewindminer K9 72% more hashrate (6.0 vs 10.3 TH/s)
- Thewindminer K9 3% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,300 W)
- Thewindminer K9 43% better efficacité (567 vs 320 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 3% better weight (14.4 vs 14.8 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 3% more heat output (11,601 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3M 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS3M | Metric | Thewindminer K9 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $15,429 |
| -$7.95 | Daily net profit | -$7.55 |
| -$11,400 | Net after 1 year | -$18,185 |
| -$14,300 | Net after 2 years | -$20,942 |
| -$17,200 | Net after 3 years | -$23,698 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Thewindminer K9320.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS3M vs Thewindminer K9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Thewindminer K9 is more profitable at $-7.55/day compared to $-7.95/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS3M vs Thewindminer K9: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Thewindminer K9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3M or Thewindminer K9?
The IceRiver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Thewindminer K9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3M vs Thewindminer K9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH while the Thewindminer K9 runs at 320.4 J/TH — a difference of 246.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (567 vs 320 J/TH).