IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS5L | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 283.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS5L
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS5L l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 50% more hashrate (12.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS5L 50% more hashrate (12.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 6% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS5L 29% better efficacité (283 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 10% better weight (15.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- IceRiver KS5L 6% more heat output (11,601 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS5L | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$7.73 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$14,821 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$17,642 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$20,462 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS5L283.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.73/day for the IceRiver KS5L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
IceRiver KS5L vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS5L or Iceriver KS3?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS5L and Iceriver KS3?
The IceRiver KS5L runs at 283.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 116.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficacité (283 vs 400 J/TH).