Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1 Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q | Specification | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 1,950.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 620 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 317,948.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 888,888.9 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 2,115 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q
iPollo V1 Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X16-Q l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 64% better efficacité (317,949 vs 888,889 J/TH). The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X16-Q 117% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 23% better power draw (620 vs 800 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 64% better efficacité (317,949 vs 888,889 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 21% better weight (10.0 vs 8.0 kg)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 29% more heat output (2,115 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 117% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q | Metric | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $3,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $489 |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$4,043 | Net after 1 year | -$1,190 |
| -$4,586 | Net after 2 years | -$1,891 |
| -$5,129 | Net after 3 years | -$2,591 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q or the iPollo V1 Hyd?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-1.92/day for the iPollo V1 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V1 Hyd?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V1 Hyd on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 570,940.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficacité (317,949 vs 888,889 J/TH).