Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Jasminer X16-Q

Jasminer X16-Q

Taux de hachage 1,950.0 MH/s Puissance 620 W Efficiency 317,948.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2H

iPollo V2H

Taux de hachage 3.4 GH/s Puissance 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

Jasminer X16-Q vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X16-Q Specification iPollo V2H
1,950.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 3.4 GH/s
620 W Consommation électrique 475 W
317,948.7 J/TH Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH
40 dB Niveau de bruit 65 dB
10.0 kg Weight 7.9 kg
2,115 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,621 BTU/hr
65/100 Home Mining Score 55/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
Jasminer Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X16-Q

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit -$1.49
Monthly -$44.64
Yearly -$543.09

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.14
Daily Profit -$1.14
Monthly -$34.20
Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $77,857 and current network difficulty as of Apr 26, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V2H l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Le Jasminer X16-Q a l'avantage en score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.

Winner: iPollo V2H — l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X16-Q

Score: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2H

139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2H more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-1.49/day for the Jasminer X16-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2H?

The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V2H at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Jasminer X16-Q or iPollo V2H?

The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 55/100 for the iPollo V2H). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-Q and iPollo V2H?

The Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 178,242.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.