SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 1,845 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS0 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 98% better efficacité (41,000 vs 650 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS0 122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 96% better power draw (1,845.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better efficacité (41,000 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 70% better weight (8.3 vs 2.5 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 2738% more heat output (6,295 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS0 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS0Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the SuperScalar K10 or the Iceriver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS0 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (41,000 vs 650 J/TH).